YORK STATE RIFLE & PISTOL ASSOCIATION, INC., ET AL., PETITIONERS v. CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK, ET AL. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

YORK STATE RIFLE & PISTOL ASSOCIATION,
INC., ET AL., PETITIONERS v. CITY OF
NEW YORK, NEW YORK, ET AL.
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
[April 27, 2020]
PER CURIAM.
In the District Court, petitioners challenged a New York
City rule regarding the transport of firearms. Petitioners
claimed that the rule violated the Second Amendment. Petitioners sought declaratory and injunctive relief against
enforcement of the rule insofar as the rule prevented their
transport of firearms to a second home or shooting range
outside of the city. The District Court and the Court of Appeals rejected petitioners’ claim. See 883 F. 3d 45 (CA2
2018). We granted certiorari. 586 U. S. _ (2019). After
we granted certiorari, the State of New York amended its
firearm licensing statute, and the City amended the rule so
that petitioners may now transport firearms to a second
home or shooting range outside of the city, which is the precise relief that petitioners requested in the prayer for relief
in their complaint. App. 48. Petitioners’ claim for declaratory and injunctive relief with respect to the City’s old rule
is therefore moot. Petitioners now argue, however, that the
new rule may still infringe their rights. In particular, petit


Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather